James P. Paoli, Esq. DeJesus v. UPS (2015 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1790) Decided July 27, 2015   Pursuant to the Appellate Division’s findings,  the Petitioner’s occupational claim was dismissed and

By James P. Paoli, Esq. On December 5, 2014, the Appellate Division addressed whether an employer must provide home modifications for an employee in Loeber v. Fair Lawn Board of

In Pschunder-Haaf v. Synergy Home Care of South Jersey, a petitioner filed a claim petition asserting that a work place accident caused injures to her spine, neck, and head. The

The article covers a series of questions and answers concerning workers’ rights to compensation for disability. The article also explains when to go to a lawyer and what the regulations

This case involves a reversal by the Superior Court on respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner filed an occupational claim against Connectron where he had been employed as a punch press

Respondent appeals from a final determination by the Workers Compensation court who found petitioner was entitled to death benefits because her husband died while on special mission. The central issue