Cedar Run – Judge Kluger Opinion

Sorry we're CLOSED due to COVID-19. Foldable advertising poster on the street

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a considerable toll upon large and small businesses alike. From governmental lockdowns of non-essential businesses in 2020 to supply chain shortages, the pandemic has had a devastating effect on businesses since it arrived on United States soil. 

Many business owners maintain all-risk insurance policies, insuring a variety of risks a business may face. One of the insurance coverages available to businesses within these polices is for loss of business which is designed to cover the actual loss of income due to the suspension of business operation. Just as hurricanes, fire and flood are business operation risks, the pandemic has challenged businesses to stay open.

Courts in New Jersey have been faced with an influx of litigation related to business income coverage related to the pandemic, specifically where businesses seek such coverage following denials of their claims, by their insurance carriers.

The United States District Court of New Jersey has recently addressed the interplay of business income coverage and exclusions to coverage related to viral activity.  In Cedar Run Orthodontics, P.A. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Civil No. 20-08156 (RBK/SAK) (November 1, 2021), Judge Robert Kugler of the District Court of New Jersey out weighed the viability of coverage for lost business income where the all-risk policy contained an exclusion related to “viral activity.”

The plaintiff in Cedar Run, a dental practice, was compelled to cease operations due to Governor Phil Murphy’s executive order on March 9, 2020, declaring a state of emergency due to the spread of COVID-19. This triggered a claim for the loss of income incurred as a direct result.  Plaintiff’s all-risk insurance carrier denied coverage arguing  that the plaintiff’s loss of business income was a result of viral activity, namely COVID-19. 

The Court held that this exclusion was unambiguous and that coverage was properly denied as plaintiff’s loss of income was caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The court concluded that this exclusion did not violate New Jersey public policy.

This ruling now appears to be the new standard for insurance coverage in New Jersey where a business suffers a loss of income from the pandemic. If this decision is appealed to the Third Circuit of the Federal Court, we will follow it closely.

What can you do to protect yourself with this information in hand?  First, you should have your business policies -reviewed by your insurance agent and broker or experienced insurance attorneys to advise you about your  rights if you suffer  business income loss from  COVID-19.. 

Cooper Levenson has a number of experienced and skilled attorneys available to assist you and your business to navigate these insurance coverage issues.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on pinterest
Pinterest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cedar Run – Judge Kluger Opinion

The COVID-19 pandemic has taken a considerable toll upon large and small businesses alike. From governmental lockdowns of non-essential businesses in 2020 to supply chain shortages,

Read More »